I Kidded you not! "FORESKIN MAN" MGM BILL, Coming to a State near - YOU!

[chazman21]

MGM Bill

A Bill to End Male Genital Mutilation in the U.S.

MGM State Bill Map

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you think its funny &/or just wacky!!!

Try this, They have Comics Books "Propaganda" to get there point across.
But, It seems they are trying to get something else across as well.

I have tried to included the PDF of the Comic books, Issue 1 & 2.
but due to the PDF size, I can't upload even one.
I do have them save to a flash drive. So, I'll try and upload some screen shot later.

You can find the Comic strip here.

The real problem is its content.
Lets see,
1) The Doctor, Doctor Edric Griswold "Dr. Mutilator" is depicted as a Monster. Really, He turns in to one to "hurt" circumcise the poor frighten White, Blue eyed, Blond Child.....wait does that seem like, Na.

2)The Super Hero "FORESKIN MAN" (Miles) lives at a Mansion / Museum for Genital Integrity in San Diego. He a very strong, well built body, Blond - Blue eyed of Aryan descent. Hummmm? Na, couldn't be....

3)In issue 2 "[b]Must See!?!" Foreskin Man Battles "Monster Mohel" and his Jew Goons - caring Guns............ Wait, What the F---!!!!

I'm not kidding you, Have a look for your self.

Did you even notice there Website show only Pictures of MALE, WHITE, BLUE-EYED BABY'S & KID"S!!!!!!!


The last time I saw crap like this was during a History Channel special on WWII and what went on before, During, & After the war in Germany.
This is just how things got started back then before the War.

And, No one said anything!!!!!!!! In till, News started to come out about what we now know as the "Holocaust".

These are the same people that would like you to Abort your child, But if he survives. Save his wiggly?

---

Some shots of Issue 1:
















Nothing to worry about, Right?????

[BioHazard74D]

Hmmm, this is the first I've seen about a comic, but a while ago I heard that some health insurance companies have stopped covering circumcisions, classifying it as a cosmetic surgery. But I do agree there seems to be push in that direction, when I feel it should be the parents decision to do/not do this, not the government or media.

[chazman21]

Some shots of Issue 2, Watch out!!!












Thats F-Up!






Thats not AntiSemitic, I don't know what is!!!!



What are they about to burn? It looks more then a beach Bonfire.



Holy-Sh@!



We The People, We Have a problem!!!!!!!
It's more then a Comic Book!!!

---

(06-06-2011 11:16 PM)BioHazard74D Wrote:  Hmmm, this is the first I've seen about a comic, but a while ago I heard that some health insurance companies have stopped covering circumcisions, classifying it as a cosmetic surgery. But I do agree there seems to be push in that direction, when I feel it should be the parents decision to do/not do this, not the government or media.

Their was some things going on awhile ago. The same people were involved.
& Yes, It is a decision that Any & Every Parent(s) has today. For now!?

They want to make it Illegal to preform one medically or for Religiously reasons. Both would be Illegal under their Bill. Unless your 18 years old and decide for your self.

And it, Looks like its going to past in San Diego.

---

Battle over circumcision shaping up in California

By SUE FISHKOFF, JTA

article created on: 2011-06-01T00:00:00


By Sue Fishkoff

SAN FRANCISCO (JTA)—In November, San Franciscans will vote on a ballot measure that would outlaw circumcision on boys under the age of 18.

Although experts say it is highly unlikely the measure will pass—very few state propositions pass, much less one this controversial—the mere fact that it reached the ballot, and in such a major city, has caused much concern for Jews and their allies.

Opponents of the bill see it as a violation of the Constitution’s protection of religious rights and an infringement on physicians’ ability to practice medicine. More than that, however, the measure is being seen as a frontal attack on a central tenet of Judaism.

“The stakes are very high,” said Nathan J. Diament, director of the Orthodox Union’s Institute for Public Affairs. “Circumcision is a fundamental aspect of Jewish ritual practice and Jewish identity. While we certainly hope the prospect of its being enacted is remote, the precedent it would set and the message it would send would be terrible, not just in the United States but around the world.

“We don’t just want it defeated,” he said, “we want it defeated resoundingly.”

Anti-circumcision activists have been around for decades, particularly on the West Coast.

They range from the Bay Area Intactivists, a loosely organized group that protests outside medical conferences in and around San Francisco, to MGM Bill (MGM stands for male genital mutilation), a San Diego-based advocacy group that has prepared anti-circumcision legislation for 46 states. MGM has managed to find a legislative sponsor in only one state: Massachusetts, last year. The bill didn’t even make it out of committee.

Matthew Hess, who founded MGM Bill in 2003 and spearheads its legislative efforts, says he is trying to protect boys from what he considers a barbaric mutilation of their bodies. He became an activist in his mid-20s, he says, when he decided that his own circumcision as an infant resulted in diminished sexual sensitivity as an adult.

“Freedom of religion stops at another person’s body,” he told JTA.

Last fall, MGM Bill changed its tactics, deciding to bypass the U.S. Congress and go straight to voters. The group gathered more than 12,000 signatures in San Francisco, enough to have the measure placed on the Nov. 8 ballot. If it passes, anyone who circumcises a boy under the age of 18 within city limits faces a $1,000 fine and up to one year in jail. The only exception would be for “compelling and immediate medical need.”

A similar effort is under way in Santa Monica, Calif., for that city’s November 2012 election. Hess says no other cities are being targeted—for now.

The Jewish community responded immediately and loudly to the San Francisco ballot initiative, with denunciations from across the nation. The American Jewish Committee called it a “direct assault on Jewish religious practice” that was “unprecedented in American Jewish life.” The Orthodox Union said the measure is “likely illegal” and is “patently discriminatory against Jews and Muslims.”

Locally, the San Francisco Jewish Community Relations Council organized a wide-ranging coalition of religious, medical, legal and political leaders to oppose the ballot measure. It was the first time that the Jewish community organized a formal counter effort because it was the first time that such a measure has made it to the ballot, according to Abby Porth, the JCRC’s associate director and the force behind the Committee for Parental Choice and Religious Freedom.

The newly formed committee, which also includes Muslim and Christian leaders, is still organizing its legal strategy.

Muslims also practice ritual circumcision on boys, although it can take place at any time before puberty.

The fight against the San Francisco ballot measure has brought a number of Muslim organizations into the JCRC-led coalition, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

Proponents and opponents of a ban on circumcision argue over the health benefits and legal aspects of the practice.

“To say it has no medical benefit and so should be outlawed is completely untrue,” said Dr. Mark Glasser, a retired Bay Area ob-gyn who estimates that he has performed hundreds of circumcisions during his 35 years in practice.

Glasser notes that the World Health Organization supports circumcision as a preventative measure against HIV transmission, and several Centers for Disease Control studies show the same result. The American Academy of Pediatrics is neutral, as is the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. But Glasser says those positions have not been revisited since the most recent AIDS studies.

Joel Paul, professor of constitutional law and associate dean of the University of California Hastings School of Law, says the law likely would not survive a court challenge—which could come even before the Nov. 8 ballot.

The proposed measure appears to violate the First Amendment protection of the free exercise of religion, and entangles the state in religious matters by putting the state in the position of judging whether a certain religious practice is permissible. Moreover, putting such a matter to a popular vote contravenes the Constitution’s many protections of the rights of individuals and minorities.

“This proposition would let the majority decide religious practice for a religious group,” Paul told JTA. “It’s not part of our politics. No one should have to go into an election and be asked to defend their religion.”

Hess argues, on the other hand, that the law is on his side. Noting that female genital mutilation is illegal in this country, he says boys should get equal protection under the law, no matter the religious beliefs of their parents.

That is a false and dangerous analogy, Porth says.

“Female genital mutilation is illegal because it is a cruel practice, medically harmful and performed for the explicit purpose of preventing female sexual satisfaction,” she said. “In contrast, there’s no credible medical evidence that male circumcision is harmful or that it prevents sexual satisfaction. Its purpose is for health reasons and religious belief.”

[kiltedguard]

I honestly don't know what to say about this. I'm cool with how things turned out, no complaints from the ladies....easier to clean my junk....I fail to see the point. I bet they are vegitarians too.

[opie]

How about that chest emblem? LOL!!

[jahwarrior72]

holy shit....if that's not some anti-Semitic shit, then Mel Gibson can be considered mispucha.

[ColdBlueSteel]

Hey Kiltedguard, I think most of them are Vagitarians!
Seriously, looks like someone has a big problem with Jews.
I don't understand it myself. I work for some and they treat me extremely well.
I know when the SHTF day happens I'm not going to be checking the religeous background of the guy who has my back.

[rthrasher2]

is it me or is it strange that a group of people are paying that close of attention to a babys dick?

oh and "Foreskin man, saving dick for the future." lol

[YukonDon]

Wow...that is just weird. And very disturbing. However, the graphics are pretty good and the page layouts. Whoever they had put together the comic was top notch.

I can't believe I spend my 1000th post writing a comment about Foreskin Man.

[opie]

(06-07-2011 07:16 PM)rthrasher2 Wrote:  is it me or is it strange that a group of people are paying that close of attention to a babys d*ck?

Yes strange people. IMO if you want to cut and chop your own child that up to the parents. It's kinda like abortion. I dont agree with it but its not my business! No one should tell anyone else what to do with and to there body.
(except parents) untill there child is 18. Then it should be up to them. Unless they are still living at home in which case all rules apply!